PayPal

Thursday, January 18, 2018

$250 Million


Last Thursday night, I believe it was, Lügenpresse chief honcho Ben Smith of BuzzFeed (formerly of Politico) was on MSNBC, talking with the hostess about the “Steele dossier” that Smith had loosed on the world. (I don’t know many of the mopes at MSNBC.)

This “dossier” is one of the most notorious journalistic hoaxes in the history of the printed word, and yet Smith and the mope were speaking as if it were a legendary scoop. He was chiding the most powerful leftwing media operations, e.g., the New York Times and Washington Post (who had passed on the hoax), for being obsessed with their status as “gatekeepers.” Smith spoke of “the public’s right to know.”

Other times over the past two weeks, we’ve heard other MSNBC
talking heads assert that the Steele dossier has “not been debunked,” just “not corroborated.”

You know what also has yet to be “corroborated”? The existence of Bigfoot, the Loch Ness Monster, and of Dracula.

The Steele dossier is often described as “opposition research.” But “opposition research” entails digging up dirt on one’s client’s opponent, not making stuff up. And journalism organizations do not pay outside firms to do their “research” for them.

Ben Smith must be the world’s richest blogger. A few years ago,
MSNBC bought a 25% stake in his blog for $250 million.

A blog worth a billion dollars?! Like crime, lying sure pays these days.

I won’t be offended, if you give me something less than $250 million.

Please hit the PayPal “Donate” button at the top of the page, and make a generous donation to help me keep the Wyatt Earp Journalism Bureau/Nicholas Stix, Uncensored going.

I thank you, and your posterity will, too.

Sincerely,


Nicholas Stix

Trump is Right about Countries in Black Africa (The Shithole Papers)

 

Village in Senegal
 

By An Old Friend
 

What I Learned in the Peace Corps in Africa: Trump is Right

By Karin McQuillan
January 17, 2018
American Thinker

Three weeks after college, I flew to Senegal, West Africa, to run a community center in a rural town.Life was placid, with no danger, except to your health.That danger was considerable, because it was, in the words of the Peace Corps doctor, "a fecalized environment."

In plain English: s--- is everywhere. People defecate on the open ground, and the feces is blown with the dust – onto you, your clothes, your food, the water. He warned us the first day of training: do not even touch water.

Human feces carries parasites that bore through your skin and cause organ failure.

Never in my wildest dreams would I have imagined that a few decades later, liberals would be pushing the lie that Western civilization is no better than a third-world country. Or would teach two generations of our kids that loving your own culture and wanting to preserve it are racism.

Last time I was in Paris, I saw a beautiful African woman in a grand boubou have her child defecate on the sidewalk next to Notre Dame Cathedral. The French police officer, ten steps from her, turned his head not to see.

Senegal was not a hellhole. Very poor people can lead happy, meaningful lives in their own cultures' terms. But they are not our terms. The excrement is the least of it. Our basic ideas of human relations, right and wrong, are incompatible.

As a twenty-one-year-old starting out in the Peace Corps, I loved Senegal. In fact, I was euphoric. I quickly made friends and had an adopted family. I relished the feeling of the brotherhood of man. People were open, willing to share their lives and, after they knew you, their innermost thoughts.

 

Market in Senegal
 

The longer I lived there, the more I understood: it became blindingly obvious that the Senegalese are not the same as us. The truths we hold to be self-evident are not evident to the Senegalese. How could they be? Their reality is totally different. You can't understand anything in Senegal using American terms.

Take something as basic as family. Family was a few hundred people, extending out to second and third cousins. All the men in one generation were called "father." Senegalese are Muslim, with up to four wives. Girls had their clitorises cut off at puberty. (I witnessed this, at what I thought was going to be a nice coming-of-age ceremony, like a bat mitzvah or confirmation.) Sex, I was told, did not include kissing. Love and friendship in marriage were Western ideas. Fidelity was not a thing. Married women would have sex for a few cents to have cash for the market.

What I did witness every day was that women were worked half to death. Wives raised the food and fed their own children, did the heavy labor of walking miles to gather wood for the fire, drew water from the well or public faucet, pounded grain with heavy hand-held pestles, lived in their own huts, and had conjugal visits from their husbands on a rotating basis with their co-wives. Their husbands lazed in the shade of the trees.

Yet family was crucial to people there in a way Americans cannot comprehend.

[Examples, please?]

The Ten Commandments were not disobeyed – they were unknown. The value system was the exact opposite. You were supposed to steal everything you can to give to your own relatives. There are some Westernized Africans who try to rebel against the system. They fail.

We hear a lot about the kleptocratic elites of Africa. The kleptocracy extends through the whole society. My town had a medical clinic donated by international agencies. The medicine was stolen by the medical workers and sold to the local store. If you were sick and didn't have money, drop dead. That was normal.

So here in the States, when we discovered that my 98-year-old father's Muslim health aide from Nigeria had stolen his clothes and wasn't bathing him, I wasn't surprised. It was familiar.

In Senegal, corruption ruled, from top to bottom. Go to the post office, and the clerk would name an outrageous price for a stamp. After paying the bribe, you still didn't know it if it would be mailed or thrown out. That was normal.

One of my most vivid memories was from the clinic. One day, as the wait grew hotter in the 110-degree heat, an old woman two feet from the medical aides – who were chatting in the shade of a mango tree instead of working – collapsed to the ground. They turned their heads so as not to see her and kept talking. She lay there in the dirt. Callousness to the sick was normal.

Americans think it is a universal human instinct to do unto others as you would have them do unto you. It's not. It seems natural to us because we live in a Bible-based Judeo-Christian culture.

We think the Protestant work ethic is universal. It's not. My town was full of young men doing nothing. They were waiting for a government job. There was no private enterprise. Private business was not illegal, just impossible, given the nightmare of a third-world bureaucratic kleptocracy. It is also incompatible with Senegalese insistence on taking care of relatives.

All the little stores in Senegal were owned by Mauritanians. If a Senegalese wanted to run a little store, he'd go to another country. The reason? Your friends and relatives would ask you for stuff for free, and you would have to say yes. End of your business. You are not allowed to be a selfish individual and say no to relatives. The result: Everyone has nothing.

The more I worked there and visited government officials doing absolutely nothing, the more I realized that no one in Senegal had the idea that a job means work. A job is something given to you by a relative. It provides the place where you steal everything to give back to your family.

I couldn't wait to get home. So why would I want to bring Africa here? Non-Westerners do not magically become American by arriving on our shores with a visa.

[Sure, they do. They hit the ground, and are immediately enriched by our magic dirt.]

For the rest of my life, I enjoyed the greatest gift of the Peace Corps: I love and treasure America more than ever. I take seriously my responsibility to defend our culture and our country and pass on the American heritage to the next generation.

African problemsare made worse by our aid efforts. Senegal is full of smart, capable people. They will eventually solve their own country's problems. [Or they won’t.] They will do it on their terms, not ours. The solution is not to bring Africans here.

We are lectured by Democrats that we must privilege third-world immigration by the hundred million with chain migration. They tell us we must end America as a white, Western, Judeo-Christian, capitalist nation – to prove we are not racist. I don't need to prove a thing. Leftists want open borders because they resent whites, resent Western achievements, and hate America. They want to destroy America as we know it.

As President Trump asked, why would we do that?

We have the right to choose what kind of country to live in. I was happy to donate a year of my life as a young woman to help the poor Senegalese. I am not willing to donate my country.


Germany Endures Another Merkel Murder

 

 

[Of related interest: “Nicholas Stix: Is the Final Solution to the German Question at Hand?”]
 

By Jerry PDX
Thursday, January 18, 2018 at 12:59:00 A.M. EST

Another young girl falls victim to Merkel's evil in the town of Kandell, Germany. Yes, we can lay this one, as all the others, right at her feet but she won't care. She has an ideology to fall back on that allows her to shut her mind to the murders and sexual assaults perpetrated by the mass importation of millions of Muslim and African males into Germany.

A 15-year-old German girl, named Mia V. in the article, is stabbed to death by her "15 year old" boyfriend, named only “Abdul D,” undoubtedly being sensitive to his underaged status. The article notes he claimed to be 14 when he arrived but according to the girl’s father he was "definitely not 15."

I'm sure he could have been 6' 4", with a full beard and grey hairs and they wouldn't have doubted his claim to be 14. That's how mindlessly idiotic PC blinders can be.

This crime has renewed calls to verify claims of “refugee” age status. One has to wonder why this has not been done since the beginning, since you end up placing adult males in schools with underaged females, if you do not.

Oh yeah, how could I forget? That kind of hysteria is reserved for white men. When it's brown and black-skinned Muslim males, then the rules are suspended. According to the article, Abdul will now undergo tests to determine his true age, though a bit late for his victim.

At the end of the article, there is of a statistical rationalization and dose of liberal guilt: First off, it mentions that there was a spike in crime initially with the first wave of male migrants, but then it dropped back down to regular levels. Assuming that's even true, of which I'm doubtful since more likely there has been some monkey business with crime reporting or statistics by behind-the-scenes diversity operatives, it's probably because women are no longer putting themselves in dangerous situations with refugees. They can no longer walk their own streets alone, because they know refugees will rape them at every opportunity, and the beta males of Germany will stand by and do nothing. They are actually setting up safe zones for women to keep from being raped by “refugees.”


Then the article points out that a German man murdered his wife and kids and asserts that if this crime had been a German boy, it wouldn't be getting so much attention. What a load of shyte. I mean really, the disingenuous arguments of liberal mindsets is a wonder to behold. If these Libyan and Afghani male refugees had never been allowed to stay in Germany, this young girl and the other girls and women, raped and/or murdered by these scumbags would all be alive or unharmed. There are always going to be some psychotic individuals who can commit deranged acts—can't be helped, humans are not perfect—but we do know that most of the time it's males doing that crap, so why bring in millions of young males who are unknown quantities and give them opportunity to lie their way into having access to young girls?

Ann Coulter: Democrats are Trying to Lie and Cry Bully Trump into Another Mass Illegal Alien Amnesty for Nothing!

 

I believe that's Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin (ZANU-PF) on the right, extending a finger of love
 

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix
 

The Left's Dirty Little Secret - Cleaned by Rosa!

By Ann Coulter
January 17, 2018
Ann Coulter.com

One thing no liberal will ever turn down is the opportunity to get a standing ovation for accusing someone else of racism.

Democrats have placed their opening bid in the immigration talks on Trump's 10-yard line – a hilariously unbalanced "compromise" that is worse than their original proposal. Now, they are battering him with accusations of racism to force him into an amnesty deal that he was specifically elected to prevent.

Forced to choose, soccer moms are going with MSNBC – and, hey, if that means we'll still have Rosa to clean the house, well, that's OK, too!

Liberals have gotten a free ride for too long on using phony claims of "racism" to promote policies that hurt black people but help themselves. It's like spoiling a kid; by the time he's 15, it's impossible to get him to clean his room.

The virtue signalers have been out in force lately, putting in museum-quality performances ever since receiving an unsubstantiated report about Trump's alleged "s---hole countries" comment in a private meeting.

At least all the raging sanctimony is based on a solid source: the claims of one guy with a track record of making up things said in private meetings.

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) is the only person accusing Trump of referring to Haiti and African nations as "s---hole countries." Four people at the meeting deny it.

Headline on Politico: "Durbin Confirms Trump's "S---hole Remarks During Meeting"

Wow, so he not only leaked the remarks -- he confirmed them!

Just a few years ago, both the Obama White House and Republican House leaders denied Durbin's claim that a Republican congressman had said to President Obama, "I cannot even stand to look at you."

The four people who deny that Trump used the word "s---hole" are Trump himself, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, and Sens. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) and David Perdue (R-Ga.). They have been required to retract nothing about the meeting. None of them have a history of being contradicted by both Republicans and Democrats over claims they made about a private conversation.

Media: WHY ARE SENS. COTTON AND PERDUE LYING ABOUT WHAT WAS SAID AT THE MEETING?

When it comes to Trump, our media have thrown the rulebook out the window. They make it up as they go along.

The virtue signalers are so proud of their anger, tears and profanity over Trump's alleged remark, they've taken to complimenting one another about their own performances:

You were awesome!

No, YOU were awesome!

Meanwhile, I can’t help but notice that there are some great openings for their kids at Haitian public schools in Brooklyn. We'd love to -- really -- but we've already made other arrangements (after pulling strings, waiting four years and paying tens of thousands of dollars to make sure their kids never go to school with blacks or immigrants).

I also can't help but notice that just as black Americans had won their full civil rights and were about to burst into the American economy ... Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.) helped pass the 1965 immigration act that began dumping millions and millions of low-wage workers on the country to compete with them.

Obviously, the people hurt most by the mass immigration of low-skilled workers are black Americans, aka, The Only Reason We Care So Much About Racism. I refer you to the Jordan Report -- overseen by actual civil rights icon Barbara Jordan.

Far from making up for the legacy of slavery, our immigration policies solve the exact same problem that slavery solved: rich people's eternal need for cheap labor.

We don't owe immigrants anything. They aren't black Americans. We didn't do anything to the Mexicans streaming across our border. Or, for that matter, to the Haitians, Ecuadorians, Pakistanis and so on. No slavery, no Jim Crow laws, no redlining -- just billions and billions of dollars in foreign aid. (Hey, does anyone know if billions of dollars would be enough to pay for a wall?)

We certainly don't owe them more than we owe our own fellow citizens, especially our black fellow citizens, who could use our help.

But foreigners who showed up yesterday act like they're the descendants of American slaves, helping themselves to the jobs, affirmative action, government assistance and racial sensitivity meant for the likes of John Lewis and Chris Rock, not illegal alien Jose Antonio Vargas. (Not that Lewis and Rock need set-asides, etc, but they're the ones who deserve them.)

Our country is hypersensitive about race because of specific injustices done to black Americans, not because we wanted to shower favors on anyone in need of a handout who manages to sneak into our country.

The Democrats treat black people like the wife who will iron your shirt for a date with your mistress. They know they don't have to do anything to keep winning 90 percent of the black vote, so they've dedicated themselves to bringing in millions of Latin Americans who will vote for them -- and also do their gardening.

Wednesday, January 17, 2018

HILLARY CLINTON SEXPOSÉ, PART II: The Clintons: THE LIES, PAYOFFS & CRIMES

 


 


 

Excerpted by Nicholas Stix
 


The Clintons: THE LIES, PAYOFFS & CRIMES

[“Read the Sexposé of the Biggest Scandal of the 2016 Election, at the Only Place Carrying It Online!”]

REVEALED AT LAST

It’s the October surprise that will shock the nation – a stunning g ENQUIRER special investigation exposes:

THE SECRET OPERATIVE WHO BILL & HILLARY HIRED TO HIDE SCANDALS!

THE CLINTONS’ OPEN MARRIAGE, HIS HOOKERS, HER TRAGIC LOVER, LIES & SPIES

THE DIRTY TRICKS & SHOCKING BRIBES TO JOURNALISTS WHO “KNEW TOO MUCH”

MONEY TRIAL TO A HOLLYWOOD MEGASTAR & BIG SHOT TV EXECUTIVE

WORLD EXCLUSIVE 9-PAGE INVESTIGATION

THE BOMBSHELL PROOF HILLY SILENCED BILL’S SEX VICTIMS!
By Dylan Howard
Editor-in-Chief
October 16, 2017
National Enquirer

HOLLYWOOD superstars, busty bimbos, strippers, hookers shady figures from America’s underworld have all been SECRETLY paid hundreds of thousands of dollars in hush money for more than two decades in a sordid scheme to help Hillary Clinton become president!

The women received the sleazy payoffs through Hillary’s political “hitman” recruited from the ranks of Hollywood’s devious fixers by a top film and television executive….

 

 

[To be continued!]
 

Read the Sexposé of the Biggest Scandal of the 2016 Election, at the Only Place Carrying It Online!

 

 

Excerpted by Nicholas Stix


EXPLOSIVE STORY THAT WILL CHANGE THE ELECTION

NATIONAL

ENQUIRER

24 YEARS OF COVER-UPS & CRIMES EXPOSED

HILLARY

HITMAN

TELLS ALL!

SHE ORDERED ME TO:

DESTROY Bill’s sex victims

BRIBE reports to bury truth

RUIN Monica Lewinsky

Hide her SLEAZY AFFAIRS

Pay HUSH MONEY to hookers

SMOKING GUN PROOF

BLOCKBUSTER 9-PAGE INVESTIGATION

October 31, 2016 [On newsstands circa October 15, 2017.]

[N.S.: Note that the MSM covered up on Hillary Clinton’s behalf the very things that they then screamed, and continue to scream from the rooftops, regarding Donald Trump. To be continued!]

Pat Buchanan: Trump May Not Permit Himself to be Intimidated by the Racist Left Out of Considering Race in Immigration Policy

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix


Trump: In Immigration Debate, Race Matters
By Patrick J. Buchanan
Tuesday - January 16, 2018 at 2:39 a.m.
Buchanan.org

President Trump “said things which were hate-filled, vile and racist. … I cannot believe … any president has ever spoken the words that I … heard our president speak yesterday.”

So wailed Sen. Dick Durbin after departing the White House.

And what caused the minority leader to almost faint dead away?

Trump called Haiti a “s—-hole country,” said Durbin, and then asked why we don’t have more immigrants from neat places “like Norway.”

With that, there erupted one of the great media firestorms of the Trump era. On Martin Luther King Day, it was still blazing.

Trump concedes he may have disparaged Haiti, which, at last check, was not listed among “Best Places to Live” in the Western Hemisphere. Yet Trump insists he did not demean the Haitian people.

Still, by contrasting Norway as a desirable source of immigrants, as opposed to Haiti, El Salvador and Africa, Trump tabled a question that is roiling the West, the answer to which will decide its fate.

Trump is saying with words, as he has with policies, that in taking in a million people a year, race, religion and national origin matter, if we are to preserve our national unity and national character.

Moreover, on deciding who comes, and who does not, Americans have the sovereign right to discriminate in favor of some continents, countries and cultures, and against others.

Moreover, in stating his own preferences, Trump is in a tradition as old as the Republic.

The original Colonies did not want Catholics here. Ben Franklin feared Pennsylvania was being overrun by stupid Germans:

“Why should Pennsylvania, founded by the English, become a Colony of Aliens, who will shortly be so numerous as to Germanize us instead of our Anglifying them, and will never adopt our Language or Customs, any more than they can acquire our Complexion.”

Just as anti-immigrant parties have arisen in Europe to stem the flood of refugees from the Mideast and Africa, an American Party (“Know-Nothings”) was formed to halt the surge of Irish immigrants during the Potato Famine of 1845-1849.

Lincoln wanted slaves repatriated to Africa. In the 19th and 20th centuries, we had Chinese and Japanese exclusion acts.

Have something to say about this column?

“Californians have properly objected” to Japanese migrants, said V.P. nominee FDR “on the sound basic ground that … the mingling of Asiatic blood with European or American blood produces, in nine cases out of ten, the most unfortunate results.”

After the Great Migration of Italians, Poles, Jews and East Europeans, from 1890 to 1920, the Immigration Act of 1925 established quotas based on the national origins of the American people in 1890, thus favoring Brits, Scots-Irish, Irish and Germans.

Civil rights leader A. Philip Randolph, a major figure in Dr. King’s March on Washington, said of the Harding-Coolidge restrictive quotas:

“We favor reducing immigration to nothing … shutting out the Germans … Italians … Hindus … Chinese and even the Negroes from the West Indies. The country is suffering from immigration indigestion.”

The Senate floor leader of the 1965 Immigration Act addressed what were then regarded as valid concerns about the future racial and ethnic composition of the country. Sen. Edward Kennedy pledged:

“Our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually … the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset. … S. 500 will not inundate America with immigrants from … the most populated and economically deprived nations of Africa and Asia.”

What Kennedy assured America would not happen, did happen.

Today, issues of immigration and race are tearing countries and continents apart. There are anti-immigrant parties in every nation in Europe. Turkey is being bribed to keep Syrian refugees out of Europe.

Boatloads of Africans from Libya are being turned back in the Med. After building a wall to keep them out, Bibi Netanyahu has told “illegal aliens” from Africa: Get out of Israel by March, or go to jail.

Angela Merkel’s Party may have suffered irreparable damage when she let a million Mideast refugees in. The larger concentrations of Arabs, Africans and Turks in Britain, France and Germany are not assimilating. Central European nations are sealing borders.

Europe fears a future in which the continent, with its shrinking numbers of native-born, is swamped by peoples from the Third World.

Yet the future alarmed Europeans are resisting is a future U.S. elites have embraced. Among the reasons, endless mass migration here means the demographic death of the GOP.

In U.S. presidential elections, persons of color whose roots are in Asia, Africa and Latin America vote 4-1 Democratic, and against the candidates favored by American’s vanishing white majority. Not for the first time, liberal ideology comports precisely with liberal interests.

Mass immigration means an America in 2050 with no core majority, made up of minorities of every race, color, religion and culture on earth, a continent-wide replica of the wonderful diversity we see today in the U.N. General Assembly.

Such a country has never existed before. Are we on the Yellow Brick Road to the new Utopia — or on the path to national suicide?

Flights from Norway (Comic Graphic)

 


Kipling’s Classic Poem, “The Young British Soldier”

 

 

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix
From The Kipling Society

Among the blessings of the English language, the works of Rudyard Kipling are exceeded in beauty by those of only one individual author, Edward de Vere, alias William Shakespeare. (The King James Bible was a collective effort.)

A line from one of the poems in the collection Barrack Room Ballads and Other Verses, whence this ditty comes, became the title of the greatest novel to come out of World War II, "from here to eternity."

[Stix Note: “‘Arf” means half.]
___________________________________

The Young British
Soldier

By Rudyard Kipling
___________________________________


WHEN the 'arf-made recruity goes out to the East
'E acts like a babe an' 'e drinks like a beast,
An' 'e wonders because 'e is frequent deceased
Ere 'e's fit for to serve as a soldier.
Serve, serve, serve as a soldier,
Serve, serve, serve as a soldier,
Serve, serve, serve as a soldier,
So-oldier of the Queen!

Now all you recruities what's drafted to-day,
You shut up your rag-box an' 'ark to my lay,
An' I'll sing you a soldier as far as I may:
A soldier what's fit for a soldier.
Fit, fit, fit for a soldier . . .

First mind you steer clear o' the grog-sellers' huts,
For they sell you Fixed Bay'nets that rots out your guts -
Ay, drink that 'ud eat the live steel from your butts -
An' it's bad for the young British soldier.
Bad, bad, bad for the soldier . . .

When the cholera comes - as it will past a doubt -
Keep out of the wet and don't go on the shout,
For the sickness gets in as the liquor dies out,
An' it crumples the young British soldier.
Crum-, crum-, crumples the soldier . . .

But the worst o' your foes is the sun over'ead:
You must wear your 'elmet for all that is said:
If 'e finds you uncovered 'e'll knock you down dead,
An' you'll die like a fool of a soldier.
Fool, fool, fool of a soldier . . .

If you're cast for fatigue by a sergeant unkind,
Don't grouse like a woman nor crack on nor blind;
Be handy and civil, and then you will find
That it's beer for the young British soldier.
Beer, beer, beer for the soldier . . .

Now, if you must marry, take care she is old -
A troop-sergeant's widow's the nicest I'm told,
For beauty won't help if your rations is cold,
Nor love ain't enough for a soldier.
'Nough, 'nough, 'nough for a soldier . . .

If the wife should go wrong with a comrade, be loath
To shoot when you catch 'em - you'll swing, on my oath! -
Make 'im take 'er and keep 'er: that's Hell for them both,
An' you're shut o' the curse of a soldier.
Curse, curse, curse of a soldier . . .

When first under fire an' you're wishful to duck,
Don't look nor take 'eed at the man that is struck,
Be thankful you're livin', and trust to your luck
And march to your front like a soldier.
Front, front, front like a soldier . . .

When 'arf of your bullets fly wide in the ditch,
Don't call your Martini a cross-eyed old bitch;
She's human as you are - you treat her as sich,
An' she'll fight for the young British soldier.
Fight, fight, fight for the soldier . . .

When shakin' their bustles like ladies so fine,
The guns o' the enemy wheel into line,
Shoot low at the limbers an' don't mind the shine,
For noise never startles the soldier.
Start-, start-, startles the soldier . . .

If your officer's dead and the sergeants look white,
Remember it's ruin to run from a fight:
So take open order, lie down, and sit tight,
And wait for supports like a soldier.
Wait, wait, wait like a soldier . . .

When you're wounded and left on Afghanistan's plains,
And the women come out to cut up what remains,
Jest roll to your rifle and blow out your brains
An' go to your Gawd like a soldier.
Go, go, go like a soldier,
Go, go, go like a soldier,
Go, go, go like a soldier,
So-oldier of the Queen!




The Young British Soldier



1890

[October 12th 2017]



Publication


First published in the Scots Observer on June 28th 1890. The poem is listed in ORG as No. 465.


It is collected in:

  • Barrack Room Ballads and Other Verses (1892)
  • Inclusive Verse (1919)
  • Definitive Verse (1940)
  • The Sussex Edition vol xxxii (1939)
  • The Burwash Edition vol xxv (1941)
  • Cambridge Edition (2013) Ed. Thomas Pinney, p. 204.


The poem


This is one of the first group of Barrack Room Ballads, published after Kipling had returned to England in 1889. [What about 1890?] It is sung or recited by an experienced soldier giving good advice to young half-trained men who have just arrived in India and are misbehaving in a foolish and dangerous manner.


[The points of the foregoing paragraph were obvious in the poem, and thus unnecessary, ditto for the next one, except for the last clause.]

Watch what you drink, take care when the cholera is about, keep your sun-helmet on, work willingly, if you must marry, marry a sensible older woman, look after your rifle, sit tight if your officer is killed, and if you are wounded and left on the battlefield, shoot yourself before the enemy's womenfolk can come out and carve you up; wisdom that the young Kipling must have heard when chatting to privates and NCOs of the British regiments stationed in Lahore.


See "Kipling and the British Army in India" by Charles Carrington. In his biography of Kipling Carrington writes (p. 212):
No author in any literature has composed in verse or prose, so full and varied amd [sic] so relentlessly realistic a view of the soldier's life, with its alterations of boredom and terror, its deadening routine, its characteristic vices and corruption, its rare glories and its irrational fascination...


Notes on the text


[Verse 1]


'Arf made recruity a young man who had had some basic training and has been posted to a regiment in the East. He is instructed in techniques which will not only save his life but also give him a more comfortable time.


[Verse 2]


rag-box slang for 'mouth'.


lay song


[Verse 3]


grog strictly a mixture of rum and water that used to be issued in the Royal Navy until 1970, but often applied to any kind of alcoholic drink.


Fixed Bay'nets slang for a particularly dangerous alcoholic drink usually made in unhygienic surroundings and guaranteed to harm the drinker, if not kill him. 'Bay'nets' is short for 'bayonets', daggers which can be fixed to the barrel of a rifle to turn it into s spear, dangerous weapons.


butts in this contest the wooden stock of the rifle with a metal plate on the end which hits the ground at "Order Arms."


[Verse 4]


cholera caused by a number of types of cholerae, with some producing more severe disease than others. It is spread mostly by food and water that has been contaminated with human excrement containing the bacterium. See Dr. Gillian Sheehan's "Kipling and Medicine", and "Cholera Camp".


Keep out of the wet perhaps the wet canteen where liquor is sold, perhaps just keep out of the rain if possible for fear of a chill leading to other complaints. There would be difficulty drying wet clothes as well.


grouse grumble


crack on nor blind curse and swear


[Verse 6]


cast for fatigue nominated for various domestic and other jobs about the barracks or camp, cleaning, removung rubbish, carrying stores about, sometimes as a mild form of punishment.
'cast' in this case, means 'chosen', as when an actor is chosen for a part.


[Verse 7]


Troop-sergeant the senior non-commissioned officer in a troop of the Royal Artillery.


[Verse 8]


swing hang. - see "Danny Deever"


[Verse 10]


Martini The Martini–Henry was a breech-loading single shot lever actuated rifle used by the British Army from 1871 which combined the falling-block developed by Henry O. Peabody, improved by the Swiss Friedrich.von Martini, combined with the polygonal rifling designed by Alexander Henry.


[Verse 11]


Bustles in this context frameworks attached to the rear of womens' dresses so the garment drapes elegantly.


limbers carts for carrying ammunition, the horses are attached to the front, the guns to the rear. The advice is to pick off the gunners who would be collecting ammunition from the limbers before they can open fire. See "The Jacket". [sic] and "Ubique".


[Verse 12]


ruin to run from a fight see "The Drums of the Fore and Aft, (Wee Willie Winkie. [sic] and "That Day".





[JMcG/JR]


Chinese Immigrant Who Served as CIA Agent in China, Arrested for Keeping Names and Phone Numbers of CIA Agents, and Locations of Secret Facilities; He’s Suspected of being Red Chinese Double-Agent Who Got Our Agents Killed

By Nicholas Stix

At Newsweek.

Tuesday, January 16, 2018

Mass Shooting of LEOs in York County, South Carolina

By A Texas Reader


4 York Co. law enforcement officers shot overnight, officials say

Three officers that were shot are York County Sheriff's Deputies. The other was a York County Police Officer that was part of their SWAT team. The incident occurred overnight into early Tuesday morning.

www.wfaa.com


An Orgy of Racist Hatred on MLK Day!

 

“Protesters attend Martin Luther King Day "Rally Against Racism" in Times Square to protest President Trump on MLK Day on Monday.” Translation: It was a rally against white people.
 

By Nicholas Stix

As I walked my chief of research down the street to the city bus stop, on his way to school this morning, I caught part of the front page of the Daily News.

It showed a picture of Michael alias Martin Luther King Jr. and a big headline “… mare.”

That had to be the end of “nightmare.”

It turns out that all sorts of black supremacist preachers and their Democrat white Uncle Toms and Aunt Jemimas had gotten together for a racist hatefest against President Donald J. Trump, and white Americans.
 

 

I’m not going to say, “Martin Luther King Jr. would be spinning in his grave, to know that his life, a celebration of love, has been turned into an occasion for hate,” because the people who say that are either brain-dead or liars.

The crooked racists who got together to play “Can you top this?” in their pornographic hatred of a white president and white Americans, spent years praising that same president, with their hands out, while he greased their palms.
 

New York officials denounce Trump as racist and maniac on Martin Luther King Day
By Jillian Jorgensen, Kerry Burke, and Leonard Greene
New York Daily News
Updated: Monday, January 15, 2018, 8:57 P.M.

The “fierce urgency of now” that Martin Luther King Jr. espoused was on full display across the city where preachers and politicians pressed for change in the new age of Trump.

On a day when America honored the man hailed as the Drum Major for Justice, New Yorkers and many across the nation protested a President derided as the poster boy for bigotry.
 

 

City and state officials ripped President Trump as they honored King at the Rev. Al Sharpton’s National Action Network’s Harlem headquarters — blasting the President for labeling Haiti and African nations “shithole countries,” and calling him everything from a racist to a maniac.

“It is embarrassing that this President comes from New York,” said Sharpton, who went on to call Trump’s vulgar comment a “national security threat” that could spark ISIS and Al Qaeda recruitment in Africa….

[Well, Al Sharpton said it, so it must be so.]

The holiday ceremony was an hours-long Trump trashing service, where speaker after speaker derided the President’s policies.

Mayor de Blasio criticized Trump’s tough immigration talk, and embraced the new Americans that helped the country thrive.

 

This man supports the killers and would-be killers of white policemen
 

“If you are a Haitian-American, thank you,” de Blasio said. “Thank you for your contributions to this city and this country. If you come from Africa and you have come here to make us better, thank you. If you left violence in El Salvador and now are helping to create a better community here in New York City, thank you. That is what we should be saying on a day that celebrates Martin Luther King Jr.”…

[Yes, MS-13 and the 18 Street gang “are helping to create a better community here in New York City.” Notice any groups that, according to Communist Mayor de Blah Blah Blah, are failing “to create a better community here in New York City”?]

In New York, thousands marked the holiday with a rally in Times Square, where demonstrators wrapped themselves in Haitian flags and protested political ignorance.
Holding signs that said, “Dump Trump,” and “Go Back to Your S---hole,” demonstrators urged the President to listen to some of King’s speeches.

“It’s important for America and Donald Trump to be re-educated,” said Roselaure Jorvelus, 36, a nurse practitioner from the Bronx.
 

 

“America stands on shoulders of my forefathers. As a Haitian-American, I’m a proud Haitian. It was very disrespectful. It was a disservice to the Haitian community and the African community to be called s---hole countries. This is my first rally ever. I just had to come — it was personal. We helped build this country. We are the American dream.”

[Ah, so Haitians built America, and whites must be re-educated. She is “a proud Haitian,” but not a proud America. Got it.]

“It’s important to show the nation that Haitians are a force,” said Nehemie Francois-Kamare, of Trenton, the red-and-blue Haitian flag shielding her from the cold.

“Everyone must know we are one nation and we’re stronger together. [Which nation is that? Haiti?] I am disgusted but I am not surprised given his track record.

It’s great we’ve come together on this important day, but our President is disgracing our nation. We’re no longer a progressive country. If Martin Luther King Jr. were here today, he’d be depressed, too.”

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand said Trump’s comments were not just beneath the Oval Office but “beneath the dignity of humanity.”

“Our country is better than this, even if our President isn’t,” she said. “And we have to call out these racist comments for what they are and fight back with political action.”
 

 

And as the pols ripped Trump, they also urged people to mobilize on their anger — all the way to the voting booth.

“Let us remember that all of us this November must march in there with the spirit of Dr. King and vote and turn it around and contain this fool that sits in the White House that needs to be removed because he does not represent our interests,” said Public Advocate Letitia James.

New York officials denounce Trump as racist and maniac on Martin Luther King Day, by Jillian Jorgensen, Kerry Burke, and Leonard Greene, New York Daily News, Updated: Monday, January 15, 2018, 8:57 P.M.]

So, that was the annual Michael “Martin Luther” King Jr. hatefest—a DPUSA two-minutes hate and campaign rally—all in the name of color-blind love.

I can't recall ever seeing a carnival of racist hatred at Washington's Birthday celebrations.

Jesse Jackson Sr. Praises and Thanks Donald Trump for a Lifetime of Service to African Americans (Video)

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix






 

A Thirteenth Reason for Abolishing MLK Day

 


 

[“Twelve Reasons Why Martin Luther King Day Should be Abolished.”]
 

By Nicholas Stix

His name wasn’t Martin Luther King Jr.; it was Michael King Jr.

He was born Michael King Jr., the son of Michael King Sr. Neither the father nor the son ever changed his name. So, how can you have a national holiday celebrating a man under a name he never legally bore?

This is similar to the Barack Obama problem, but the BO problem is worse. In “Obama’s” case, a man was illegally elected president of America twice running under a fake name.

Was Martin Luther King Jr.—You Know, America’s Official Greatest Intellectual—Actually a Big Dummy?

By Nicholas Stix

Funny thing is, we’ve had brilliant blacks, but nobody bows down at their feet.

By my VDARE colleague, Patrick Cleburne.

Google's Totalitarian Model

Via An Old Friend


“Don’t Be Evil”? Google is Becoming a Police State
Google employees are creating their own enclave of mandatory wokeness, but they're not content to keep this ideological policing within their own walls.
By Robert Tracinski
January 12, 2018
The Federalist

Back in the day, Google famously adopted the corporate motto, “Don’t be evil.” It hasn’t turned out so well.

The problem is that their motto didn’t define what constitutes evil, so it left an opening for narrow-minded zealots to commandeer company resources in a witch hunt against whatever they define as the forces of wickedness.
That’s what has happened at Google, which has adopted a corporate culture of quasi-totalitarian ideological uniformity that it is now starting to impose on everyone who uses its services. Which is, let’s face it, pretty much everyone. For now.

picture we get is a corporate culture of lockstep ideological uniformity, enforced by censorship, badgering, and blacklisting. Damore furnishes one note from a Google manager in 2015, addressed to “hostile voices.”
“I will never, ever hire/transfer you onto my team. Ever. I don’t care if you are perfect fit or technically excellent or whatever.

I will actively not work with you, even to the point where your team or product is impacted by this decision. I’ll communicate why to your manager if it comes up.

You’re being blacklisted by people at companies outside of Google. You might not have been aware of this, but people know, people talk. There are always social consequences.
Another manager proposed creating a “public-within-Google” document that “calls out those googlers who have made public statements that are unsupportive of diversity.” Other admit to maintaining their own blacklists based on “opinion[s] about religion, about politics, or about ‘social justice.'” While conservatives were regarded as “bad apples” to be excluded, other Googlers were recruiting or advocating for violent leftist “antifa” groups, with no apparent consequences. Then there’s this doozy:
Google’s internal company systems allowed employees and managers to maintain a ‘block list’ of other employees with whom they did not wish to interact. For example, if A adds B to her block list, B is not able to look A up in the company directory, communicate with A through the internal instant messaging system, view A’s contact information or management chain, or see A’s posts on internal social media. A and B would not be able to work together constructively on an engineering project if either person blocked the other.
“Peer bonuses” that were supposed to reward Google employees for outstanding work performance were also used, with management approval, to reward them for arguing against heterodox political views, while something called “social pecking” was used—”unambiguously,” in the words of one Google vice-president—to gang up on dissenters. If you read through the whole complaint you see what this kind of “pecking” looks like, and it looks a lot like—well, it looks a lot like angry political Twitter, complete with people lobbing obscenities at each other over politics.

What company in its right mind would encourage its employees to treat each other this way? Well, maybe a company that is not in its right mind. An internal presentation urging sensitivity for employees who are “living as a plural being”—which seems to refer to some kind of multiple personality disorder—lists one of the forbidden thoughts: “assumptions that we’re mentally damaged.” This is literally an environment where the insane are welcome and the sane are not.

All of this is part of a wider trend in Silicon Valley toward enforcing political conformity. Commenting on this trend a few years back, when some people were trying to blacklist Silicon Valley Trump supporters like Palmer Luckey and Peter Thiel, I wrote: “The logical conclusion, when you think about it, is that every company should have a Chief Political Officer in charge of monitoring the ideological deviations of its employees.” We can now see that Google is going one better. It has a whole culture of co-workers informing on each other and referring dissidents for what the Damore lawsuit calls “crowdsourced harassment.” I call it the self-enforcing police state.

Google is a private company and can create its own little enclave of mandatory wokeness if it likes, Damore’s lawsuit notwithstanding. The problem is that Googlers are not content to keep this ideological policing within their own walls. We discovered recently that when Donald Trump complains about “fake news,” that makes him the very worst threat in the entire world to freedom of the press.

But what happens when the Left inveighs against “fake news”? What happens is what Google just did to conservative websites—including The Federalist. David Harsanyi runs down the supposedly contested claims that Google has decided to flag for our Web site. It targets claims we didn’t make, links to debunkings that don’t address us, treats ideological partisans as if they are impartial fact-checkers, and applies scrutiny to publications on the Right that it doesn’t apply to those on the Left.

None of this makes sense if you view it as an objective attempt to police accuracy. It makes perfect sense if you view it as an attempt to pre-emptively discredit Googlers’ ideological enemies in the minds of unwary Google users. I don’t think this is going to be very effective, because it depends on Google users acting like Google employees and volunteering to enforce groupthink on themselves. But it is revealing about Google’s intent.

Some on the Right are responding to this by calling for Google to be regulated as a monopoly. That’s the best way to ensure that nothing changes. Regulating search engines as a public utility would tend to freeze the leading company in place, as regulators did with AT&T back in the day, and discourage new competitors from entering the field. Instead, let the market do its work. All the things that make me outraged about Google’s crusade for political correctness also strike me as signs of enormous weakness for the company, both internally and externally.

Internally, Google has the hallmarks of a company being run for its employees, to accommodate their private agendas, petty political vendettas, and weird psychological dysfunction—not to serve the interests of its shareholders, customers, or users. It’s clear from the documents in the Damore suit that there has been a disgruntled faction of right-leaning employees inside Google who have been complaining to the HR department about their treatment, but at this point, I doubt many of them will want to stay. There is already a steady trickle of Silicon Valley refugees, like Tim Ferriss and Sam Altman, fleeing what Ferriss calls “a peculiar form of McCarthyism masquerading as liberal open-mindedness.”

The other news from the lawsuit is that Google seems to have a very active HR department and a lot of mandatory internal meetings, which is also a bad sign. I expect that talented young engineers with nonconformist ideas won’t risk wasting years of their lives in such a repressive multi-layered bureaucracy. In short, the same impulses that led Silicon Valley entrepreneurs to upend established industries will now be working to upend Google.

Externally, Google’s whole business model is based on the fact that we let them relentlessly collect our data and mine it for information about our behavior and preferences. They’re trying to go even farther and get us to invite Google’s AI assistant into our homes, so they can monitor our lives in even finer and more intimate detail. If that’s their business plan, perhaps gaining a reputation as the PC thought police isn’t the best idea.

There is currently no good alternative to Google’s search engine—readers have recommended them to me, but so far none of them work half as well—or to some of its other services, like Web ads. But I’m certainly not going to volunteer to make any part of my life or my business too dependent on a Google product, and I’ll be eagerly looking for alternatives. Google isn’t quite 20 years old, and its dominance over the flow of our information is very, very recent in the scheme of things. It rose up by outmaneuvering bigger and more established rivals, and somebody can do the same to them.

If I were a tech entrepreneur, I would be slavering at the prospect of getting rich by knocking down such a bloated, bureaucratic, arrogant company. They’re practically asking for it, so get to work.

The Real MLK

By Nicholas Stix

By Patrick Cleburne.

MLK Jr. Day Hate Hoax? Racial Slurs Left on T-Shirt Stretched over Newton Resident's Mailbox

 


 

By A Texas Reader
Mon, Jan 15, 2018 11:02 p.m.

Racial slurs left on t-shirt stretched over Newton resident's mailbox

"It's not the proper way to wake up and enjoy Martin Luther King, Jr Day," said Marlin who was very disturbed by the display.
www.kvue.com

Monday, January 15, 2018

Twelve Reasons Why Martin Luther King Day Should be Abolished

 

 

By Nicholas Stix

1. King was such a bad man that his widow, Coretta Scott King, had to get a federal judge to place his FBI files under wraps until 2027, or there would have been scandal upon scandal, which would have either imperiled the movement to have a national holiday named for him, or at least have made such a movement look as ridiculous as it really was;

2. King is an idol like Mohammed. The holiday in his name therefore sanctifies every bad thing he ever did;

3. King was a serial plagiarist, who stole his title as a “Dr.” at Boston University from a white man, Jack Stewart Boozer. The King cult has helped destroy academic standards in America;

4. He was one of the greatest adulterers in American history, having literally had a girl (many girls, actually) or a prostitute (no disrespect to working girls intended) in every port. Thus has the King cult helped to destroy sexual morality in America;

5. He supported violence, declaring “Riots are the voice of the voiceless.” By his own admission, he deliberately used the so-called principle of non-violence to incite violence;

6. He degraded the black church into a partisan political organization that routinely violates the tax laws, and violates the very “constitutional principle” of the “separation of church and state” (never mind that no such principle exists in the constitution) that supporters of the King cult ruthlessly and one-sidedly impose on white Christians;

7. He was the most powerful supporter of Communism that this country had ever seen. He surrounded himself with Communists, and took their money: Stanley Levison, Hunter Pitts “Jack” O’Dell, Stanley Levison, Bayard Rustin, Myles Horton, Zilphia Horton, The Rev. Fred Shuttlesworth, Carl Braden, Anne Braden, James A. Dombrowski, Aubrey Williams, Abner W. Berry, Ahmed Ben Bella, et. al.;

8. He destroyed the concept of civil rights. As the most celebrated leader of the so-called civil rights movement, more appropriately called the black rights movement, which through verbal legerdemain took something that is the inheritance of every legal American citizen—civil or constitutional rights—he made them the private property of blacks, including blacks that aren’t even citizens;

9. He was America’s greatest orator, and did something that to my knowledge, no other major American orator has done. Whereas politicians typically wait for a later speech to contradict what they have claimed to be all that is near and dear to them, King accomplished this feat in the same, “I Have a Dream” speech. At different points in the speech, he both called on America to be guided by the principle of color-blindness, and to impose race-specific policies granting welfare and reparations programs to blacks. Thus did MLK contribute more than any other American to the degradation of oratory;

10. He undermined the rule of law in general, as something that only whites must obey, but which must serve blacks, and particularly the principle, enshrined in the 14th Amendment of equality under the law. The 1964 U.S. Civil Rights Act, which his cultists credit him with getting enacted, has served to relegate whites to the status of second-class citizens;

11. He was a traitor, and helped to mainstream treason. On April 4, 1967, he delivered a speech at New York’s Riverside Church which could have been written in Hanoi, and delivered via diplomat’s pouch, so true was it to Communist lies. King claimed to be speaking on behalf of peace, but it was the peace of the graveyard. He was acting as the advocate of the North Vietnamese Communists and their allies; and

12. His true beliefs were the opposite of the color-blindness to which he paid lip-service. At the time of his murder, he was in Memphis demanding hard racial quotas for all public service jobs, matching the black proportion of the populace, qualifications be damned.

Trump Breaks with Tradition of Martin Luther King Day

By Grand Rapids Anonymous
Monday, January 15, 2018 at 6:50:00 P.M. EST

Trump breaks tradition of MLK day—again, well done, sir.

In short, the story listed all the activities and memorials past presidents participated in since 1994. Clinton signed legislation, Bush invited blacks to the White House, Obama did his black thing—Trump?
He went golfing... [chuckle].

At ABC News.

Martin Luther King Jr. Would Have Stood with Trump: He Didn't Want Migrants from Third-World Hellholes Here, Either!

 

 

By Reader-Researcher RC
 

This weekend, the media was imploding over the unconfirmed "s**thole countries" comment that President Trump was accused of making by two far left Democrats who took part in an immigration meeting with the President. Sen. Dick Durbin claimed that the President used 'hate-filled, vile and racist' language in an immigration meeting. Now, to clarify, even if the dubious and leaked comments were said by the President, there is nothing 'racist' about them; to claim that they are racist is to confuse ethnicity with citizenship. Despite this - one of the media's main talking points, and a talking point by crazed and corrupt leftist

At Gateway Pundit.

 

Is the Chicago PD a Support Service for Armed Robbers?

 

“Aaron Goldstein, Democratic candidate for Illinois attorney general, speaks Jan. 8, 2018 during a forum at First Unitarian Church of Chicago in Hyde Park”
 

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

“Police described the three suspects as between 20 and 24 years old. They did not release a detailed description of the suspects.”
Either the Chicago Tribune is lying, or the Chicago PD is a criminal organization that should be prosecuted and disbanded. Refusing to share the descriptions of armed robbery suspects is aiding and abetting them.

And it’s all in vain. Because the CPD (or the Chicago Tribune) is protecting the armed robbers, we know who they are.

As Chicago Tribune reader, scrappy koala, put it in 2011, when Trib Editor Gerould W. Kern declared war on the daily’s readers, after they complained about Kern covering up racist black-on-white crime in Chicago’s poshest areas,

scrappy koala at 12:03 AM June 11, 2011

I've said it before and I'll say it again that you are right. Race doesn not matter and you dont need to tell us what race it is because we already know. Especially when you dont tell us. If this was White on Black crime there is no doubts on anyones mind that all of a sudden race would matter and you would report it but if its black criminals you wont say race which actually tells us the race. When ever a news site wont say the race I instantly know which race. This works pretty much 100% of the time without fail.
Candidate for Illinois attorney general robbed at gunpoint
By Tony Briscoe, Jeremy Gorner, and Peter Nickeas
January 12, 2018, 7:00 A.M.
Chicago Tribune

A candidate running for Illinois attorney general was robbed at gunpoint while he was taking promotional photos for his campaign Thursday afternoon in the Northwest Side ward where he’s also the Democratic committeeman, according to his campaign manager and authorities.

Aaron Goldstein, 42, and several members of his campaign team were in the middle of taking publicity shots when the robbery happened, according to Goldstein’s campaign manager.

The robbery took place about 3:25 p.m. in the 4600 block of North Albany Avenue in Albany Park, when three men in their early 20s approached them, according to a law-enforcement source.

One of the men flashed a handgun and demanded the camera equipment and other personal belongings from the team, according to police.

The gunman and two other men robbed Goldstein and four others of camera equipment and their cellphones before they ran away, the law enforcement source said. As of Thursday evening, no one was in custody, police said.

Police described the three suspects as between 20 and 24 years old. They did not release a detailed description of the suspects.

Campaign manager Robert Murphy, who was not with the team during the incident, said Goldstein, Democratic ward committeeman for the 33rd Ward and a resident of Albany Park, was taking promotional images for the campaign with an “in-the-neighborhood kind of” message.

Goldstein and the others weren’t harmed in the robbery, and they were later assured by police that the robbery wasn’t a targeted act, Murphy said.

“So, as far as the campaign, we are moving forward,” Murphy said. “Basically, this was a totally a random act of violence in the community. But when it happens to you, of course, you’re shooken up.

“He says he’s fine, and he was concerned about everyone else instead of how he is – but that’s just how he is.”

Goldstein is one in a field of eight candidates who are running in the Democratic primary for attorney general after Lisa Madigan announced she wouldn’t run for reelection. Goldstein, a supervising attorney at the Cook County Public Defender’s Office, unseated longtime incumbent and former Ald. Dick Mell to become the 33rd Ward Democratic committeeman in 2016.

Sunday, January 14, 2018

Defending His Mother’s Racist Rapist: Amanda Kijera’s Son Speaks

 

 


 

[Re: “Haiti: Liberal Activist is Brutally Raped, Again and Again, by a Black Man, but She Blames White Men!”]
 

By Jerry PDX
Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 1:22:00 P.M. EST

Imagine, if you will, your own mother is raped and you actually defend the rapist. That's where the Amanda Kijera story takes a Twilight Zonish twist that gives us an insight in how negroes think, what passes for thinking anyways. The rape “victim’s” son is named Alonzo Drayon Kijera, and he has publicly gone on record as “clarifying the black man's ‘decision’ to rape his mother”:

“Amanda Kijera’s Son Clarifies His Mother Holding the White Man Responsible for a Black Man’s Decision to Rape Her.”

[N.S.: That’s good ‘ol Lor Marie’s Blog! She used to cross swords with me here.]

I couldn't find a photo online of this mope but with a name like “Alonzo Drayon,” I think it's safe to assume his father is black, and he identifies with his black side.

This is what Mr. Kijera wrote to an online blogger. I have posted responses to his “points”:

*As her son it is my common belief that it is due to the ignorance of the white society that our brothers and sisters have little tolerance for the white society*

WTF? What does that have to do with your mom being raped? Obviously setting up to frame the assault in a biased political context. "Common belief"? Negroes love to say that. Common belief is a way for negroes to say: I'm coming from a position of truth because I'm referring to something that everybody just knows and it's absolute truth because "everybody knows it." "Everybody" means all blacks and their white liberal lackeys. Common beliefs are usually fantasies concocted by racist blacks that get passed around and repeated over and over until they become accepted fact.

*Her statement was not to say that every Caucasian is this way, because therefore she would be contradicting herself*

Well yeah, duh. She'd be calling herself or any other white a rapist. I think we realize that, at least most whites do, I'm not sure about most of your brothas and sistas. Is there another race of people that pretentiously states redundancies more than negroes?

*Instead of further more antagonizing this realist, she should be praised. Praised for the eyes she has opened across the nation*

Huh? OK, let me elucidate what he's trying to express in his childishly illiterate fashion: Instead of condemning the realist (I think he misspelled "rapist" there), and possibly "antagonizing" (you know, don't make the negroes angry) him, his mother is a hero for blaming the white man for her rape, despite the fact it was a black man that did the deed. That absolves me, a black man and her son, of any complicity in this act, due to my race. However, it's perfectly acceptable to make all white men complicit, due to their race.

*To see my own mothers name burn into flames due to exploits and white supremacists i not only disrespectful but proves her point all the more*

Who's burning her name into flames? The PC media, if anything, has treated the story with kid gloves, as it always does with black race violence. Due to "exploits and white supremacists"? Proves what points? What the hell is he talking about? More confused thinking that defies analysis, but to negroes it sounds profound and must mean something so they shake their fists and nod knowingly when they hear it. OK, I don't know how old her son is, maybe he's pretty young still but even when I was a kid I would have realized that was crap.

I'll tell you what, Alonzo. Go meet the man that raped your mom, slap him a high-five, and then the two of you can sit around and rap about how it's righteous to rape white bitches (even if it's your own mother), coz of the way the white man is keepin' you down.



 

It’s Always About the Goddamn Oil!

 

 

By Reader-Researcher RC


Perils of Empire

"In Perils of Empire: The Roman Republic and the American Republic, the author traces how the Roman Republic gained an empire and lost its freedoms, and he ponders the expansionist foreign policy that has characterized the American Republic since Teddy Roosevelt led the Rough Riders up San Juan Hill. This well-researched study of both long-term trends and current events highlights the difficulties of balancing the demands of ruling an empire and protecting democratic political institutions and political freedoms." – Publisher's website.
books.google.com
 

Bush's Former Oil Company Linked to bin Laden Family
President Bush recently signed an executive order to freeze the US financial assets of corporations doing business with Osama bin Laden.
www.rense.com


BP and Iran: The Forgotten History
Stephen Kinzer: More than a Half Century Ago, Geopolitics and Oil Changed Iran - for the Worse
www.cbsnews.com

[Previously, at WEJB/NSU:

“James Woods HAMMERS Bill Clinton in Ferocious Tweetstorm “You Looted Haiti Like a Peg-Legged Pirate.”.]
 

Shithole Venn Diagram: Pass It on

 


 

Via Reader-Researcher RC

White Man's Burden: Invading, Foreign Criminals Complain They were the Victims of “Discrimination” and “Poverty”

 

 

By A Texas Reader


KVUE caption: “Congressional leadership is trying to work out a deal to potentially protect undocumented youth. They were protected from deportation under the DACA program - which President Donald Trump phased out last year.”

N.S.: They are neither “undocumented,” nor are they “youth.”

"I felt the discrimination,” said Loera. “Whether it was comments or the way people would treat us, the way people would look at us. My family struggled and struggles with extreme poverty, which is something very prevalent in our communities."


Group to leave Austin to protect DACA in D.C.

Along with her peers going through similar struggles, one local DACA recipient is taking her fight to Capitol Hill.
www.kvue.com

White man's burden.
 

Johnothan Cohasset ·
Cohasset, Maryland
“I feel the discrimination too. I'm forced to pay for it all. Get your illegal butt back across the border.”

Is Haiti Secretly Awash in Oil?

 

[Previously, at WEJB/NSU:

“James Woods HAMMERS Bill Clinton in Ferocious Tweetstorm “You Looted Haiti Like a Peg-Legged Pirate.”.]



By Reader-Researcher RC


Haiti's Depopulation Agenda is About Its Billion Dollar Oil Reserve - Haiti, Hurricane Matthew and the connection to the Clintons
www.neonnettle.com


Haiti could have larger oil reserves than Venezuela

Haiti could have larger oil reserves than Venezuela. Amidst the utter devastation left in the wake of the earthquake that rocked Haiti on January 12th, new findings ...
www.worldoil.com

According to French scientist Daniel Mathurin, “The Central Plateau, including the region of Thomond, the plain of the cul-de-sac and the bay of Port-au-Prince are filled with oil.” He added that “Haiti's oil reserves are larger than those of Venezuela. An Olympic pool compared to a glass of water, that is the comparison to show the importance of oil Haitian compared to those of Venezuela.”

Saturday, January 13, 2018

“Arrest Him!” Pro-Trump Protesters Storm London Mayor’s Speech

 

George Clooney as London Mayor “Sadiq Khan” in the London Marathon, April 13, 2014
 

By Reader-Researcher RC

N.S.: The Mayor of London is commonly known by one name, but may have two or more aliases.

 

George Clooney as “Jim Acosta,” CNN operative
 

“Arrest Him!”: Pro-Trump protesters storm London Mayor’s speech (PHOTOS, VIDEO)
Pro-Trump protesters stormed a speech being made by Sadiq Khan, shouting pro-Brexit slogans and calling for the London Mayor’s arrest. The disruption led to the temporary suspension of the speech.
www.rt.com

 

Sadiq Khan or Jim Acosta as “George Clooney, Hollywood operative”
 

Joseph Sobran: Journalism v. Conservatism

 


 

By Joseph Sobran
The National Review Years, 11/5/1990 -- Words seem to form partnerships. At one time, you discriminated between. Now you discriminate against. "Discrimination" now betokens not a fine mind, but a character flaw: one that makes you Politically Incorrect, by the way.

Liberalism has succeeded in imposing its verbal prescriptions on the whole population: everyone must now mind even his or her pronouns, or face obloquy. Politesse has shifted from "Negro" to "black" to "African-American," each new whim of whoever decides these things as imperious as the last. A sectarian ideology has triumphed when it has turned itself into an etiquette that all must observe.

We all sense that the language has been marshaled into Political Correctness. Is there any central ordering principle?

I think so. It was expressed succinctly in the chant of the Stanford protestors: "Hey hey, ho ho, Western culture's gotta go." We're being nudged into a series of little repudiations of the Western patrimony. The changing rules embody this. Profanity and obscenity are okay; but new taboos forbid "racism," "sexism," and other Politically Incorrect attitudes. (Religion is purely optional, but bigotry must be "eliminated.")
 

 

In The Whig Interpretation of History, Herbert Butterfield lamented the tendency of historians to see the controversies of the past in the anachronistic categories of "progressive" and "reactionary": Whig history interpreted the clash of, say, Reformers and Church not in terms the raging opponents would have understood, but as a battle between the forces of the future (Luther) and the forces of the past (Pope Leo X).

This way of flattening complicated disputes into easily grasped melodrama has trickled down into journalism. Many "news" stories have as their subtext the battle between Progressive good guys and Reactionary villains. Despite the official journalistic ethic of neutrality, unmistakable moral commitment creeps into news reports of conflict between pope and theologian, government and protestor, business and labor, white and black, male and female. We sense we're getting cues as to which side we should be rooting for.

The Progressive forces are always driven by the best motives: they are compassionate, courageous, conscientious, enlightened, future-oriented, peace-loving. These terms all have a left-wing odor about them now (though the media rarely use the term "left- wing"). The Reactionaries, meanwhile, are driven by atavisms: hate, fear, superstition, greed, ignorance, selfishness, sheer resistance to "change."

"Hate," for example, has become associated exclusively with "right-wing" causes in journalistic discourse. (See Newsweek, passim.) No Progressive ever hates anyone, though he (or she) may feel righteous anger or rage. Journalese does use the term "right-wing" freely, but without defining it: it is a catchall for anything belonging to the dark past. Theocracy, capitalism, slavery, militarism: these are right wing. The fascist, the monarchist, the libertarian, the constitutionalist: all, somehow, right wing, though their only common denominator is that they all oppose socialism.

What conservatives call "bias" in the media is really more like a Weltanschauung, half-conscious, but shaping and shading every- thing. Journalists may try hard to be accurate and to suppress overt partisanship; they usually don't realize they are taking sides in the very categories they start with. They don't understand that there are alternative categories.
 

Behind the Times

In the mind of the thoroughly assimilated journalist, the conservative is not someone who has a specific philosophy to be discussed, listened to, debated. He's simply someone who's behind the times, clinging to the disreputable and embarrassing past that all educated people should have outgrown. The conservative is not so much wrong as defunct, doomed to extinction. Why debate a dinosaur?

The ultimate Progressive categories are not heaven and hell, or good and evil, or order and chaos, but Future and Past. Even the cusswords of the Progressive are chronological: archaic, outdated, Neanderthal, medieval, antediluvian, fossilized, obsolete, mossbound, prehistoric, antiquated, troglodytic, thirteenth- (or eighteenth-) century, etc. To the liberal these are ultimate condemnations, unanswerable. The Past, him bad!

So for the dramaturgy of journalism, the problem in every controversy is a simple matter of typecasting: Which side represents the Past, and which the Future? And this sort of stereotyping, with its built-in predictions as to who's bound to prevail, has led journalists into a series of embarrassing errors. Reagan was Reactionary; therefore he was not a viable candidate. The pro-life movement was Reactionary; therefore it wasn't news (unlike, say, the civil-rights movement). The Shah of Iran and Somoza were Reactionary; therefore they were bound to be supplanted by Progressive forces. (And what do you do with phenomena like 2 Live Crew, which represents free speech -- Progressive -- but is horribly sexist - Reactionary?)

History itself has begun to demolish the Progressive mythology. Socialism is in moral, political, and economic ruins. The noble savages of the Third World have shown us what comes after "liberation." And it's all so tiresome. We have seen the Future, and it has acquired its own discreditable past. Progressive hope is just about used up. But journalism hasn't yet learned any other language.

###

Copyright © 2018 by the Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation. All rights reserved. This article by Joe Sobran was published originally in National Review magazine on November 5, 1990. This is one of 34 articles in the Sobran anthology, Joseph Sobran: The National Review Years: Articles from 1974 to 1991, published by FGF Books in 2012. The book is currently out-of-stock, but the Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation hopes to reprint soon.

Joe Sobran (1946-2010) was an author, political commentator, and syndicated columnist for over 35 years.

###

Help the Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation in its mission to promote and preserve the Joe Sobran legacy by giving a tax-deductible donation online or mail your check to
Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation
344 Maple Avenue West, #281
Vienna, VA 22180

Call 1-877-726-0058 to order or donate by phone.

Thank you for your support!